Chickens, slaughtering and dressing · Mississippi

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant

Hattiesburg, MS · ~1,163 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chickens, slaughtering and dressing workplace, earning a grade D.

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant: 4.1 TCR = 125% of Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant safety composite

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2020

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant injury rate improved

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant's TCR fell 1.2 from 4.4 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=6.3 · 2020=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Hattiesburg, MS ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 125% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #28/41
  • PHOTO Mar-Jac Poultry AL, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 175 inj
  • SIZE ~1,163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mar-Jac Poultry AL, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant averages 4.1 TCR (125% of the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=6.3 · 2020=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dre establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 41 Chickens, slaughtering and dre employers in Mississippi.

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant (1,163 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant
Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant (1,163 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant has more employees than the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.2 1.9 37 8 1
2018 6.3 3.7 77 9 0
2017 2.6 0.8 25 8 0
2016 4.4 1.4 36 10 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · MS · Hattiesburg

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dressing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 186 employers in Hattiesburg, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mar-Jac Poultry AL, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR George's Cassville Processing Plant 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Liberty Foods 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baptist Memorial Hospital - Golden Triangle 1,172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Processing Plant 1,173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olive Branch, MS Distribution Center 1,175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Strike Casino Resort-Tunica 1,151 FTE
CITY-NEAR HATTIESBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hattiesburg 4,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR merit health wesley 852 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chain Electric Company 722 FTE
NAT-TCR Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington Nursing Center 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 7 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Evans & Associates Utility Services, Inc. - Oklahoma City 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain Rutland VT 1,163 FTE
NAT-SIZE ES3 LLC : York, PA (GDC) 1,163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mondelez Global Central/West Sales 1,164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matrix North American Construction 1,162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.