Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living

Portland, OR · ~54 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living runs at 552% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living: 21.0 TCR = 552% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living safety composite

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 33.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living: 18.2 → 37.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 104.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.61× in 2024

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living's TCR rose 19.3 from 18.2 in 2017 to 37.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 104.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.0 · 552% of ind

  • DART 33.7 DART
  • RANK #204/218
  • PHOTO Sunol Creek Memory C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sunol Creek Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living averages 21.0 TCR (552% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living TCR series: 2017=18.2 · 2018=7.2 · 2023=104.9 · 2024=37.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living (54 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living
Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living (54 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 37.5 33.7 9 1 0
2023 104.9 104.9 3 0 0
2018 7.2 4.8 3 0 0
2017 18.2 15.9 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Portland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sunol Creek Memory Care 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Plain Labor, LLC. 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Decatur 20.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belle Reve Senior Living 20.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meadow Ridge Farms Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Spring Farms LLC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Omega Rigging & Machinery Moving 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE P&C Construction 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Maplewood at Danbury LLC 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Desert Behavioral Health Hospital 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR YESS Logistics LLC 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oshkosh Vending 21.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE California Die Casting, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Shapes 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stevensville 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE GHEMM Company 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.