Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Sunol Creek Memory Care

Pleasanton, CA · ~57 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sunol Creek Memory Care runs at 552% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sunol Creek Memory Care: 21.0 TCR = 552% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sunol Creek Memory Care safety composite

Sunol Creek Memory Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sunol Creek Memory Care: 15.3 → 17.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 50.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2022

Sunol Creek Memory Care's TCR rose 2.5 from 15.3 in 2016 to 17.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 50.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Pleasanton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.0 · 552% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #595/635
  • PHOTO South Plain Labor, L…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Plain Labor, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sunol Creek Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sunol Creek Memory Care averages 21.0 TCR (552% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sunol Creek Memory Care TCR series: 2016=15.3 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=18.6 · 2019=50 · 2020=21.4 · 2021=14.2 · 2022=17.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Sunol Creek Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #595 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Sunol Creek Memory Care (57 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sunol Creek Memory Care
Sunol Creek Memory Care (57 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sunol Creek Memory Care has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 17.8 7.1 5 0 0
2021 14.2 14.2 5 0 0
2020 21.4 18.7 7 1 0
2019 50.0 50.0 1 0 0
2018 18.6 15.9 7 0 0
2017 9.6 0.0 3 0 0
2016 15.3 2.5 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Pleasanton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Plain Labor, LLC. 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawthorne Gardens Senior Living 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Decatur 20.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belle Reve Senior Living 20.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR South Plain Labor, LLC. 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6957-MTJ 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodward Skilled Nursing and Therapy 21.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE ODW Logistics - Lockbourne Hometown Foods 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Performance Plastics Appleton 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE KLS Treehouse Groveport 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockland Mfg Friendship Village Plant 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.