Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) · Georgia

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C.

Macon, GA · ~37 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) workplace, earning a grade A.

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C.: 0.5 TCR = 10% of Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. safety composite

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2024

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. injury rate improved

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C.'s TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Macon, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/40
  • PHOTO ESS TRANSPORTATION INC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ESS TRANSPORTATION INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. averages 0.5 TCR (10% of the Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. falls in its industry

1,130 Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, s establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 40 Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, s employers in Georgia.

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. (37 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C.
Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. (37 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. has fewer employees than the Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · GA · Macon

1,130 Dump trucking (e.g., gravel, sand, top soil) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 300 employers in Macon, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ESS TRANSPORTATION INC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belfield 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HDM Transportation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Petro-Chemical Transport 51075 Harlingen 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJ Georgia Warehouse 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clary Logging Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant Tugalo 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brevard Office 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Center, Navicent Health 3,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1201-Navicent Health Medical Center 3,858 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SAV3 1,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAV3 1,305 FTE
NAT-TCR Bette & Cring, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brackenridge Operations 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ofs Brands Corporate Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Region 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE BK-Prince Kuhio #623 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE BK-University #602 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pate Company 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.