Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel · Pennsylvania

Brackenridge Operations

Brackenridge, PA · ~558 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brackenridge Operations runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade A.

Brackenridge Operations: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brackenridge Operations safety composite

Brackenridge Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

Brackenridge Operations injury rate improved

Brackenridge Operations's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Brackenridge, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/29
  • PHOTO Nucor Cold Finish Wi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~558 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor Cold Finish Wisconsin, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Brackenridge Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brackenridge Operations averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brackenridge Operations TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Brackenridge Operations falls in its industry

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 29 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g employers in Pennsylvania.

Brackenridge Operations (558 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brackenridge Operations
Brackenridge Operations (558 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Brackenridge Operations has more employees than the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, pl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2019 0.5 0.3 3 0 0
2018 0.9 0.7 6 0 0
2017 0.8 0.6 5 0 0
2016 0.6 0.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · PA · Brackenridge

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor Cold Finish Wisconsin, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rochester Operations 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Cold Finish South Carolina 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zelienople Operations 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Holland Plant 558 FTE
STATE-SIZE Constellation Power Corporate 559 FTE
STATE-SIZE Br 101 & 990- Communications Test Design Inc 557 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA - Zara 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brackenridge Construction Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Ofs Brands Corporate Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hazel Trucking Company L.L.C. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bette & Cring, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Region 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley 558 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwestern Virginia Mental Health Institute 558 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Des Peres Hospital 558 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mahaska County Hospital 558 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.