Public health program administration, nonoperating · North Carolina

Public & Mental Health Departments

Smithfield, NC · ~175 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Public & Mental Health Departments runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Public health program administration, nonoperating workplace, earning a grade A.

Public & Mental Health Departments: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Public health program administration, nonoperating BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Public & Mental Health Departments safety composite

Public & Mental Health Departments scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Public & Mental Health Departments: 0.7 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Public & Mental Health Departments's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.7 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · Smithfield, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/22
  • PHOTO Health and Human Ser…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Health and Human Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Public & Mental Health Departments in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Public & Mental Health Departments averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Public health program administration, nonoperating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Public & Mental Health Departments TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=2.1 · BLS 3.2

Where Public & Mental Health Departments falls in its industry

267 Public health program administ establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 22 Public health program administ employers in North Carolina.

Public & Mental Health Departments (175 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Public & Mental Health Departments
Public & Mental Health Departments (175 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Public & Mental Health Departments has more employees than the Public health program administration, no median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.1 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · NC · Smithfield

267 Public health program administration, nonoperating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 62 employers in Smithfield, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Health and Human Services 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Hill 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (35) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCA - BHS/Public Guardian 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.H. Griffin Infrastructure LLC 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freedom Industries, Inc. 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Storr Office Environments, Inc. 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horsepower Site Services 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnston Health 1,593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Government Complex (County Courts, Administration & Law Enforcement Buildings) 790 FTE
CITY-NEAR AAF Flanders Smithfield 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1321 401 FTE
NAT-TCR AIC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Order Fulfillment Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Automotive Systems, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR JFSNA at Sabic Burkville 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 288 midalantic 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverwood Health and Rehabilitation 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE BASF Attapulgus Site 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Barbara (Castb) 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.