CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services · Wisconsin
Heartland Business Systems - PW
PEWAUKEE, WI · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 1.8
- Avg TCR
- 0.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Heartland Business Systems - PW runs at 356% of its industry's injury rate — far more dangerous than the typical CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services workplace — earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 1.8
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 0.5
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 2
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Heartland Business Systems - PW's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Heartland Business Systems - PW's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 0.5 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 541512.
Where Heartland Business Systems - PW falls in its industry
292 CAE (computer-aided engineerin establishmentsSafer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.1.
Heartland Business Systems - PW has an average TCR of 1.8, which is 356% of the industry average (0.5) for CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services. This is significantly worse than average.
Safety Insights for Heartland Business Systems - PW
Heartland Business Systems - PW operates an establishment with approximately 54 full-time equivalent workers in PEWAUKEE, WI, classified under the CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services industry (NAICS 541512). Across 2 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 2 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the F letter grade (Failing Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 0.5 for CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services, Heartland Business Systems - PW's workforce experiences 356% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 2 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Heartland Business Systems - PW as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Heartland Business Systems - PW's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 541512 — CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2017)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 112,349 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Heartland Business Systems - PW (this establishment) | 1.78 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Computer systems integrator services industry avg | 0.50 | BLS IIF, NAICS 541512 |
| Wisconsin state avg (all industries) | 4.92 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Heartland Business Systems - PW to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2017: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Heartland Business Systems - PW's reported OSHA injury record versus its CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services peers — not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 356% of the CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services benchmark, Heartland Business Systems - PW reports more injuries than typical peers — ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Heartland Business Systems - PW's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Heartland Business Systems - PW reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.