General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Georgia

Heartland Express Atlanta

Atlanta, GA · ~55 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartland Express Atlanta runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Heartland Express Atlanta: 2.3 TCR = 51% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartland Express Atlanta safety composite

Heartland Express Atlanta scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heartland Express Atlanta: 0.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2024

Heartland Express Atlanta's TCR rose 4.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 51% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #62/166
  • PHOTO Genesis Transportati…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Genesis Transportation Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Heartland Express Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartland Express Atlanta averages 2.3 TCR (51% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartland Express Atlanta TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Heartland Express Atlanta falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 166 General freight trucking, long employers in Georgia.

Heartland Express Atlanta (55 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartland Express Atlanta
Heartland Express Atlanta (55 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Heartland Express Atlanta has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2023 4.9 3.7 4 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2019 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · GA · Atlanta

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Genesis Transportation Co., Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tindall Haul & Erect 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milford, DE - 255 North Rehoboth Boulevard 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier 1 trucking LLC 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ofi Peanut Shelling Co. Rochelle 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Corporate Headquartes 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klondike Training Center 4826 Klondike Rd Lithonia 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Notch Electric Membership Corporation 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR WATERTOWN 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Link Manufacturing, Ltd 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TCCo-POR 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cottage Grove Lumber 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Development 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE 043-MTR 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alamo/National Reno - 54A2 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.