General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · South Carolina

Tindall Haul & Erect

Spartanburg, SC · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tindall Haul & Erect runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Tindall Haul & Erect: 2.3 TCR = 51% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tindall Haul & Erect safety composite

Tindall Haul & Erect scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2024

Tindall Haul & Erect injury rate improved

Tindall Haul & Erect's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Spartanburg, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/71
  • PHOTO Genesis Transportati…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Genesis Transportation Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Tindall Haul & Erect in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tindall Haul & Erect averages 2.3 TCR (51% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tindall Haul & Erect TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Tindall Haul & Erect falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 71 General freight trucking, long employers in South Carolina.

Tindall Haul & Erect (36 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tindall Haul & Erect
Tindall Haul & Erect (36 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Tindall Haul & Erect has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.8 11.8 4 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · SC · Spartanburg

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 294 employers in Spartanburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Genesis Transportation Co., Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Express Atlanta 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milford, DE - 255 North Rehoboth Boulevard 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier 1 trucking LLC 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Logging 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Log Creek Logging Inc 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE JASPER GENERATING STATION 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLEET RADIO 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPARTANBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg Medical Center 5,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County 1,633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County Government 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Stantek 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ringland-Johnson, Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pawn America Corporate 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aragra - Ansen - Main Location 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE FABco LLC McCarty 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Cargo-Columbus 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Romanoff Electric Residential - TN 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Rapids/Kentwood 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.