Retirement homes with nursing care · Pennsylvania

Heatherwood Retirement Community

Honey Brook, PA · ~48 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heatherwood Retirement Community runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Retirement homes with nursing care workplace, earning a grade B.

Heatherwood Retirement Community: 4.8 TCR = 73% of Retirement homes with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heatherwood Retirement Community safety composite

Heatherwood Retirement Community scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

Heatherwood Retirement Community injury rate improved

Heatherwood Retirement Community's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 57.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2018=3.8 · 2021=13.0 · 2022=57.5 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Honey Brook, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #165/754
  • PHOTO Rehabilitation Cente…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rehabilitation Center of Hampton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Heatherwood Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heatherwood Retirement Community averages 4.8 TCR (73% of the Retirement homes with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heatherwood Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2018=3.8 · 2021=13 · 2022=57.5 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Heatherwood Retirement Community falls in its industry

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #165 safest of 754 Retirement homes with nursing employers in Pennsylvania.

Heatherwood Retirement Community (48 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Heatherwood Retirement Community
Heatherwood Retirement Community (48 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Heatherwood Retirement Community has fewer employees than the Retirement homes with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2022 57.5 53.1 1 12 0
2021 13.0 0.0 5 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Honey Brook

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 13 employers in Honey Brook, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rehabilitation Center of Hampton 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jerseyville Manor 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Hall Wise 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culpeper Care Center LLC 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sylvan America, Inc. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade North 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rolling Rock Building Stone, Inc. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Stores Building 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tel Hai Retirement Community 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR AJB 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honey Brook 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hickory House Nursing Home 140 FTE
NAT-TCR Solmet Technologies 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Five Star Premier Residences of Reno 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Porter Regional Hospital 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Becker Automotive Designs, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chateau of Batesville 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 503 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Resource Central 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.