Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Florida

HEICO Aerospace

Hollywood, FL · ~141 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HEICO Aerospace runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

HEICO Aerospace: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HEICO Aerospace safety composite

HEICO Aerospace scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

HEICO Aerospace held a steady TCR band

HEICO Aerospace's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Hollywood, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/24
  • PHOTO Pratt & Whitney Amer…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pratt & Whitney Amercon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

HEICO Aerospace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HEICO Aerospace averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HEICO Aerospace TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where HEICO Aerospace falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 24 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Florida.

HEICO Aerospace (141 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate HEICO Aerospace
HEICO Aerospace (141 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

HEICO Aerospace has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · FL · Hollywood

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 137 employers in Hollywood, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney Amercon 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Services OWS Dallas 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc. Plant 81-West Virginia 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls Royce: Performance 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE PMR-Martin Plant 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cathcart Construction Company Florida LLC Main Office 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE BU 3466 - FTE-Minneola to US27 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Tampa Glass Company 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4263-47852 815 FTE
CITY-NEAR BROWARD 784 FTE
CITY-NEAR 47852 CUR DIPLOMAT HOLLYWOOD FL 732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tower Eight Staffing Solutions dba Labor For Hire - Hollywood 665 FTE
NAT-TCR North Farmington High School 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tube Forming Systems, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Liberty Univ Tilley Subconne 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Vending 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cartoon Network Hotel 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE TK Elevator Houston 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yates Industries 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metrie EL & EL - Galt 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.