Aircraft Engine Parts Manufacturing (blades & vanes) · Pennsylvania

Pratt & Whitney Amercon

Middletown, PA · ~188 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt & Whitney Amercon runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft Engine Parts Manufacturing (blades & vanes) workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt & Whitney Amercon: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Aircraft Engine Parts Manufacturing (blades & vanes) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt & Whitney Amercon safety composite

Pratt & Whitney Amercon scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pratt & Whitney Amercon: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 3.26× in 2024

Pratt & Whitney Amercon's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Middletown, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #2/13
  • PHOTO HEICO Aerospace
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~188 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HEICO Aerospace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pratt & Whitney Amercon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt & Whitney Amercon averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Aircraft Engine Parts Manufacturing (blades & vanes) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt & Whitney Amercon TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt & Whitney Amercon falls in its industry

366 Aircraft Engine Parts Manufact establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 13 Aircraft Engine Parts Manufact employers in Pennsylvania.

Pratt & Whitney Amercon (188 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt & Whitney Amercon
Pratt & Whitney Amercon (188 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Pratt & Whitney Amercon has more employees than the Aircraft Engine Parts Manufacturing (bla median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.8 6 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2021 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · PA · Middletown

366 Aircraft Engine Parts Manufacturing (blades & vanes) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 99 employers in Middletown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HEICO Aerospace 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Services OWS Dallas 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc. Plant 81-West Virginia 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls Royce: Performance 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE UGI Bethlehem 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benchmark Construction Company, Inc. 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103461 - Hickory Run Energy Station 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&R Enterprises, LLC 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR PATWN - EAST ZONE REGIONAL HUB 1,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Contact 982 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZEHR 629 FTE
CITY-NEAR NHS 532 FTE
NAT-TCR Richmond 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Forks River Elementary School 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 253 Aut - Greensboro 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR J-Lok Corp 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gilco Contracting, Inc. 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residential Services 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vanee Foods Company 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Garden's Rehab and Care Center 188 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.