Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Washington

Helion Energy, Antares

Everett, WA · ~121 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Helion Energy, Antares runs at 646% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade F.

Helion Energy, Antares: 3.2 TCR = 646% of Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Helion Energy, Antares safety composite

Helion Energy, Antares scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2022→2023

Helion Energy, Antares injury rate improved

Helion Energy, Antares's TCR fell 0.8 from 3.6 in 2022 to 2.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.6 · 2023=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Everett, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 646% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK P8
  • PHOTO PVE C20 - Product Va…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PVE C20 - Product Validation Engineering (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Helion Energy, Antares in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Helion Energy, Antares averages 3.2 TCR (646% of the Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Helion Energy, Antares TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.8 · BLS 0.5

Where Helion Energy, Antares falls in its industry

319 Physical science research and establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Helion Energy, Antares (121 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Helion Energy, Antares
Helion Energy, Antares (121 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Helion Energy, Antares has fewer employees than the Physical science research and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2022 3.6 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · WA · Everett

319 Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 271 employers in Everett, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PVE C20 - Product Validation Engineering 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BART (BSA) 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR UHM/CTAHR/PEPS 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR R&D 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PSE, FAC - Factoria Service Center 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crux Subsurface 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Total Mechanical 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nutter Corporation 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA004 31,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA660 EVERETT MEDICAL CTR COLBY-EVERETT HR 3,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County Government 3,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100640 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dayton-Granger, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2338 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1203 - Van Buren Township Mi (Dry) Depot 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hayward Facility 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boggs Transport Inc. 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100028 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100092 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.