Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Arizona

South Point Energy Center

Mohave Valley, AZ · ~21 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Point Energy Center runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

South Point Energy Center: 0.9 TCR = 78% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Point Energy Center safety composite

South Point Energy Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

South Point Energy Center: 0.0 → 0.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2024

South Point Energy Center's TCR rose 0.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Mohave Valley, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO Lawrence Energy Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lawrence Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

South Point Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Point Energy Center averages 0.9 TCR (78% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Point Energy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 1.2

Where South Point Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Arizona.

South Point Energy Center (21 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate South Point Energy Center
South Point Energy Center (21 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

South Point Energy Center has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2023 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AZ · Mohave Valley

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 7 employers in Mohave Valley, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lawrence Energy Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AES Indiana - Petersburg 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Muskogee Power Plant 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cane Run Station 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curry Farms LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE A & P Farms 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARLINGTON BARNS 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Energy Shop and Warehouse 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABF Freight 139 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mohave Valley Fire Department 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mohave Valley Sheriff Sub Station 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVSO MV FT.MOHAVE SO SUB-ST/ANIMAL 22 FTE
NAT-TCR Real Alloy Recycling, LLC. - Loudon, TN 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 102 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill McHenry 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ingevity - Covington Carbon Plant 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wolfskill Energy Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otay Mesa Energy Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hermiston Power Plant 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Delta Corporation 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.