Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · California

Wolfskill Energy Center

Fairfield, CA · ~21 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wolfskill Energy Center runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

Wolfskill Energy Center: 2.0 TCR = 169% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wolfskill Energy Center safety composite

Wolfskill Energy Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wolfskill Energy Center held a steady TCR band

Wolfskill Energy Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=9.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Fairfield, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 169% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/41
  • PHOTO Escalante Generating…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Escalante Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Wolfskill Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wolfskill Energy Center averages 2.0 TCR (169% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wolfskill Energy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Wolfskill Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 41 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in California.

Wolfskill Energy Center (21 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wolfskill Energy Center
Wolfskill Energy Center (21 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Wolfskill Energy Center has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.0 9.0 2 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 0 1 0
2020 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CA · Fairfield

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Fairfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Escalante Generating Station 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Castle Power Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300A 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miller Steam Plant 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 108 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR NorthBay Healthcare Medical Center 1,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jelly Belly Candy Company 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Propulsion Company (Fairfield CA) 460 FTE
NAT-TCR Appleton Store 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Supported Independence Srvc of or - 795 Calvin 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Equipment Corporation New Knoxville 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #33 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Point Energy Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hermiston Power Plant 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Delta Corporation 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westbrook Energy Center 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.