Commuter rail systems (except mixed mode) · Texas

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin

Austin, TX · ~62 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commuter rail systems (except mixed mode) workplace, earning a grade A.

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin: 1.0 TCR = 21% of Commuter rail systems (except mixed mode) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin safety composite

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin held a steady TCR band

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485112 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P96
  • PHOTO 57221 KINGS POINT
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 57221 KINGS POINT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin averages 1.0 TCR (21% of the Commuter rail systems (except mixed mode) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin falls in its industry

71 Commuter rail systems (except establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin (62 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin
Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin (62 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Herzog Transit Services Inc - Austin has fewer employees than the Commuter rail systems (except mixed mode median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2022 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485112 · TX · Austin

71 Commuter rail systems (except mixed mode) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 57221 KINGS POINT 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55594 YAMHILL 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55819 CRYSTAL LAKE 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HERZOG TRANSIT SERVICES - TRI RAIL 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE EP Energy - Eagle Ford (Dilley) 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Dog Drilling 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koserca Headquearters 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monahans 2790 South Wilma, Monahans, TX 79756 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Watford City Fabrication Shop 1-2 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Contracting LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR University of Minnesota Rochester 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisk Electric Company - Las Vegas, NV 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Louis Dreyfus Company - Grand Junction 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE M&W Precast, LLC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primeaux RV 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menomonee Falls Location 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.