General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · North Carolina

HFCS Transport

Winston Salem, NC · ~49 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HFCS Transport runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

HFCS Transport: 3.2 TCR = 71% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HFCS Transport safety composite

HFCS Transport scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

HFCS Transport injury rate improved

HFCS Transport's TCR fell 2.5 from 5.2 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Winston Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 71% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #63/125
  • PHOTO Rands Trucking,Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rands Trucking,Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

HFCS Transport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HFCS Transport averages 3.2 TCR (71% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HFCS Transport TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 4.5

Where HFCS Transport falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 125 General freight trucking, long employers in North Carolina.

HFCS Transport (49 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HFCS Transport
HFCS Transport (49 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

HFCS Transport has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.9 6.3 5 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2016 5.2 5.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · NC · Winston Salem

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 255 employers in Winston Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rands Trucking,Inc 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trucking 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rome, NY - Perimeter Rd 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chadderton Trucking Inc. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zackly Rite Farms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor's Nursery-Raleigh 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball Hatchery # 3 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matthews Operations Center 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - Winston Campus 13,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wake Forest University Health Sciences 3,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 9040 Team Support Center 1,813 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - Team Support Center 859 FTE
NAT-TCR Gainesville 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Infinity Images, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bossier City 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Plantation Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peci Office 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Constructors, Inc. Main Office 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Data Papers, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Administration 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.