Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels · North Carolina

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint

Durham, NC · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels workplace, earning a grade F.

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint: 7.7 TCR = 256% of Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint safety composite

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2018→2020

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint injury rate improved

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.7 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Durham, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 256% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #197/239
  • PHOTO Courtyard
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Courtyard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint averages 7.7 TCR (256% of the Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint TCR series: 2018=9.7 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.0

Where HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel (except casino hotels) & establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #197 safest of 239 Hotel (except casino hotels) & employers in North Carolina.

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint (35 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint
HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint (35 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

HGS - Hilton Garden Inn Southpoint has fewer employees than the Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 13.3 0.0 5 0 0
2018 9.7 2.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NC · Durham

9,342 Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Courtyard 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPIL Associates LLC 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DOUBLETREE BY HILTON SALT LAKE CITY DOWNTOWN 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR H Hotel/Homewood Suites LAX 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boykin Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEW COLONY SOW FARM 6276 -EST 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Field Services 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball LLC Hatchery # 2 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hooper Sobering 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Indianapolis - 96th St 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Los Angeles Enjoy House 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate Technologies LLC Grand Rapids MI 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Technologies LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greater Albany Public School District Office 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region (110-9306) 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.