Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing · Indiana

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc.

North Manchester, IN · ~109 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 105% of Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. safety composite

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc.: 5.0 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2019

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.4 from 5.0 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · North Manchester, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 105% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #22/24
  • PHOTO Eatonton Cooperative…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eatonton Cooperative Feed Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (105% of the Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=1 · 2018=4 · 2019=6.4 · BLS 3.9

Where Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. falls in its industry

756 Livestock feeds, supplements, establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 24 Livestock feeds, supplements, employers in Indiana.

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. (109 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc.
Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. (109 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. has more employees than the Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.4 4.6 7 0 0
2018 4.0 3.0 4 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 5.0 5.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · IN · North Manchester

756 Livestock feeds, supplements, concentrates and premixes, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 28 employers in North Manchester, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eatonton Cooperative Feed Co., Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ProTrition LaVergne Feed Mill 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gerber & Sons, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maysville feed mill 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Muncie Svc Ctr 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE 605-NiSource-Fort Wayne IN-Operating HQ 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Starcon @ BP Whiting 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Church of the Brethren Home, INC dba Timbercrest Senior Living Community 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT MANCHESTER UNIV HAIST DINING 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester Metals, Inc 118 FTE
NAT-TCR Arnold Tool & Die Co 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cox Wood of Alabama 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR northeast seafood products 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynex/Rivett Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Paltz Family Health Center 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kelco Contracting, LLC 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gates-Columbia MO 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE VRC Falls Village 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.