Plating metals and metal products for the trade · Texas

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing

Denton, TX · ~102 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing: 7.5 TCR = 227% of Plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing safety composite

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2021

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing injury rate improved

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing's TCR fell 7.0 from 9.0 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=11.5 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Denton, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 227% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #36/43
  • PHOTO LCOA - Laminating Co…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LCOA - Laminating Company of Amercia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hi-Tech Metal Finishing averages 7.5 TCR (227% of the Plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=11.5 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Hi-Tech Metal Finishing falls in its industry

585 Plating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 43 Plating metals and metal produ employers in Texas.

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing (102 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hi-Tech Metal Finishing
Hi-Tech Metal Finishing (102 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Hi-Tech Metal Finishing has more employees than the Plating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2020 3.7 2.8 3 1 0
2019 9.3 6.8 11 0 0
2018 9.4 4.3 10 1 0
2017 11.5 4.1 7 7 0
2016 9.0 5.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · TX · Denton

585 Plating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 211 employers in Denton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LCOA - Laminating Company of Amercia 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Georgia Anodizing LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pentagon Technologies 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Holland Metal Finishing Company Inc 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tier 1 Completions Solutions 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Yard 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denver City 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Baytown Service Center 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Paccar 2,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Motors Company 2,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Denton 1,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR 060 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton 1,040 FTE
NAT-TCR Dutchmen Plant 845 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal-Weld Specialties, Inc 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 381695-Cle-Strongsville Br 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ABC Millwork - Shakopee 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paslin - Hoover 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mar Cor Purification - Manufacturing MN 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastland Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE DEMA Engineering Co. 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.