Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) · Kentucky

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc

Madisonville, KY · ~53 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc: 1.9 TCR = 90% of Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc safety composite

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2024

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc injury rate improved

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc's TCR fell 0.7 from 2.1 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=2.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Madisonville, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 90% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #8/28
  • PHOTO H&H Brown Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: H&H Brown Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc averages 1.9 TCR (90% of the Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=2 · 2021=3.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc falls in its industry

2,560 Armature rewinding services (e establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 28 Armature rewinding services (e employers in Kentucky.

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc (53 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc
Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc (53 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc has more employees than the Armature rewinding services (except on a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2018 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · KY · Madisonville

2,560 Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 90 employers in Madisonville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR H&H Brown Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrated Power Services Beaumont Service Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Region Customer Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pengate Handling Systems Inc - Scranton 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazard Service Center 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glasgow Water Company 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry's Plumbing 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Youngblood Excavating & Contracting Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Madisonville 1,361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Deaconess 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Madisonville, Ky 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR 875 482 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire Systems Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PTI Technologies 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Seward Operating, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Anabranch Recovery Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smf Sacramento International Airport 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chatham 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summerford Pallet Company - AL 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Downs Care and Rehabilitation 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.