Hotels (except casino hotels) · California

Hilton San Francisco Financial District

San Francisco, CA · ~225 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilton San Francisco Financial District runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade D.

Hilton San Francisco Financial District: 5.1 TCR = 170% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilton San Francisco Financial District safety composite

Hilton San Francisco Financial District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hilton San Francisco Financial District held a steady TCR band

Hilton San Francisco Financial District's TCR held near 0.0 from 4.3 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=7.8 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 170% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #311/1298
  • PHOTO Maumee Bay Lodge
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maumee Bay Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hilton San Francisco Financial District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilton San Francisco Financial District averages 5.1 TCR (170% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilton San Francisco Financial District TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=7.8 · 2021=2 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.0

Where Hilton San Francisco Financial District falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #311 safest of 1298 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in California.

Hilton San Francisco Financial District (225 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilton San Francisco Financial District
Hilton San Francisco Financial District (225 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hilton San Francisco Financial District has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 3.6 6 0 0
2023 7.3 6.5 9 0 0
2022 9.1 8.3 12 0 0
2021 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 7.8 4.6 17 0 0
2018 2.2 1.3 5 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 8 0 0
2016 4.3 4.3 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · San Francisco

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maumee Bay Lodge 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aloft Tempe 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Inn & Suites 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Cascada 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trinity Packing Company 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floradale 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE CINNABAR SERVICE CENTER 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresno Water Division 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Mac Machine & Metal Works, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Maumee Bay Lodge 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Standard Industrial Supply, Inc 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeastern Products, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Fergus Falls 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superstop Enterprises 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Machine and Engineering - Deeds 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04087 - WM of Oregon, Inc 225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.