Automatic transmissions, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Georgia

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc

Monroe, GA · ~957 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Automatic transmissions, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc: 2.1 TCR = 39% of Automatic transmissions, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc safety composite

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2021

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc injury rate improved

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc's TCR fell 2.9 from 3.5 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=3.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Monroe, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO AUTO TRANSM NEW PROD…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 107 inj
  • SIZE ~957 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AUTO TRANSM NEW PRODUCT CTR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc averages 2.1 TCR (39% of the Automatic transmissions, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=3.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.6 · BLS 5.4

Where Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc falls in its industry

320 Automatic transmissions, autom establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Automatic transmissions, autom employers in Georgia.

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc (957 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc
Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc (957 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc has more employees than the Automatic transmissions, automotive, tru median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.6 0.4 8 0 0
2020 1.4 1.1 12 0 0
2019 1.3 0.6 13 0 0
2017 3.7 3.1 44 0 0
2016 3.5 2.3 30 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · GA · Monroe

320 Automatic transmissions, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 37 employers in Monroe, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AUTO TRANSM NEW PRODUCT CTR 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sese Industrial Services US Corp 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toledo Transmission Operations 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BorgWarner Livonia 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hanwha Q Cells USA, Inc. 958 FTE
STATE-SIZE GA484 Savannah River Tissue 959 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Concrete Services 960 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MGE3 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hitachi Astemo 996 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6055 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6055 889 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Walton Hospital 416 FTE
NAT-TCR Clariant Minneapolis 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - IL062 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Campus Residential 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SRT 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE FL0361CV3 957 FTE
NAT-SIZE USS Irvin Works 957 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bosch Rexroth FniP 957 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenspring Village 957 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.