Differential and rear axle assemblies, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Tennessee

Sese Industrial Services US Corp

Chattanooga, TN · ~163 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sese Industrial Services US Corp runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Differential and rear axle assemblies, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sese Industrial Services US Corp: 2.1 TCR = 39% of Differential and rear axle assemblies, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sese Industrial Services US Corp safety composite

Sese Industrial Services US Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sese Industrial Services US Corp: 1.4 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2024

Sese Industrial Services US Corp's TCR rose 1.4 from 1.4 in 2022 to 2.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 39% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #9/16
  • PHOTO Toledo Transmission …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toledo Transmission Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Sese Industrial Services US Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sese Industrial Services US Corp averages 2.1 TCR (39% of the Differential and rear axle assemblies, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sese Industrial Services US Corp TCR series: 2022=1.4 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 5.4

Where Sese Industrial Services US Corp falls in its industry

320 Differential and rear axle ass establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 16 Differential and rear axle ass employers in Tennessee.

Sese Industrial Services US Corp (163 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sese Industrial Services US Corp
Sese Industrial Services US Corp (163 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sese Industrial Services US Corp has fewer employees than the Differential and rear axle assemblies, a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.4 14 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · TN · Chattanooga

320 Differential and rear axle assemblies, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toledo Transmission Operations 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BorgWarner Livonia 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lafayette Plant 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 105708 - Genera Hiwassee Expansion 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arcade Marketing inc. 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gem Care Main Office 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE MECO 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR InterConnect Wiring 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinehurst LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Corru Kraft Buena Park 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amphenol Intercon Systems 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stacys Plant 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unified Field Services Corporation 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ft Wayne in 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Donaldson Co 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.