Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production · Idaho

HM Clause - Nampa

Nampa, ID · ~64 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HM Clause - Nampa runs at 271% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production workplace, earning a grade F.

HM Clause - Nampa: 12.2 TCR = 271% of Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HM Clause - Nampa safety composite

HM Clause - Nampa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2024

HM Clause - Nampa injury rate improved

HM Clause - Nampa's TCR fell 1.2 from 14.3 in 2017 to 13.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.3 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=20.6 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=21.0 · 2024=13.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Nampa, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.2 · 271% of ind

  • DART 8.7 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Luis A. Scattini & S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Luis A. Scattini & Sons, LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

HM Clause - Nampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HM Clause - Nampa averages 12.2 TCR (271% of the Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HM Clause - Nampa TCR series: 2017=14.3 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=4 · 2020=20.6 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=21 · 2024=13 · BLS 4.5

Where HM Clause - Nampa falls in its industry

331 Vegetable and potato farming, establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Vegetable and potato farming, employers in Idaho.

HM Clause - Nampa (64 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate HM Clause - Nampa
HM Clause - Nampa (64 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

HM Clause - Nampa has fewer employees than the Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.0 8.7 5 1 0
2023 21.0 12.6 5 5 0
2022 10.9 2.2 4 1 0
2021 11.6 11.6 3 3 0
2020 20.6 20.6 2 8 0
2019 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 14.3 6.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · ID · Nampa

331 Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 228 employers in Nampa, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Luis A. Scattini & Sons, LP 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFF 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little Leaf Farms PA 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Potato F 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JBP Pocatello 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate Group L.L.C. Nampa Plant 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charmac Inc 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAHN SUPPLY, INC. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOI2 2,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center, Nampa (Garrity)-SAHS-ID/OR 1,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lactalis Nampa 863 FTE
NAT-TCR ILC006 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TXS013 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas Shop TX FXFE-DALS 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aroostook Trusses, Inc. 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avid Pallet Services HQ - Main 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE FB Harding 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waste Industries Columbia 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.