Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production · California

DFF

Oxnard, CA · ~112 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DFF runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production workplace, earning a grade F.

DFF: 12.0 TCR = 268% of Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DFF safety composite

DFF scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DFF held a steady TCR band

DFF's TCR held near 0.2 from 8.4 in 2017 to 8.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 350.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.4 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=24.5 · 2021=350.5 · 2022=250.4 · 2023=150.2 · 2024=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Oxnard, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 268% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #164/175
  • PHOTO HM Clause - Nampa
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 91 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HM Clause - Nampa (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

DFF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DFF averages 12.0 TCR (268% of the Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DFF TCR series: 2017=8.4 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=24.5 · 2021=350.5 · 2022=250.4 · 2023=150.2 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 4.5

Where DFF falls in its industry

331 Vegetable and melon farming, v establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 175 Vegetable and melon farming, v employers in California.

DFF (112 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate DFF
DFF (112 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

DFF has more employees than the Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 4.1 4 0 0
2023 150.2 50.1 3 0 0
2022 250.4 250.4 5 0 0
2021 350.5 300.4 7 0 0
2020 24.5 19.3 26 16 0
2019 9.9 2.9 17 0 0
2018 9.1 4.8 15 0 0
2017 8.4 5.4 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Oxnard

331 Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 303 employers in Oxnard, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HM Clause - Nampa 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luis A. Scattini & Sons, LP 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little Leaf Farms PA 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Potato F 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE HMB North Property 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE PULIDO AG SERVICE 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central City Harvesting, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle Purina PetCare 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OXR1 2,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Oxnard 1,753 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030383 1,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Regional Medical Center 1,352 FTE
NAT-TCR Maumelle Ar 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HL-O Elementary 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgeport Corretional Center 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Works 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clayton Residential Home 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharon Healthcare Willows 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fosston Hospital 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.