Boxes, waste, merchant wholesalers · Georgia

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc.

Atlanta, GA · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. runs at 514% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, waste, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc.: 11.3 TCR = 514% of Boxes, waste, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. safety composite

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. held a steady TCR band

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 12.6 in 2017 to 12.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.6 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=4.7 · 2021=21.5 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=12.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 514% of ind

  • DART 12.5 DART
  • RANK #48/49
  • PHOTO Reserve Iron Ohio
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reserve Iron Ohio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. averages 11.3 TCR (514% of the Boxes, waste, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. TCR series: 2017=12.6 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=4.7 · 2021=21.5 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=12.5 · BLS 2.2

Where J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. falls in its industry

1,126 Boxes, waste, merchant wholesa establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 49 Boxes, waste, merchant wholesa employers in Georgia.

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. (64 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc.
J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. (64 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

J&J Pallet Solutions, Inc. has more employees than the Boxes, waste, merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.5 12.5 5 1 0
2023 10.7 10.7 5 0 0
2022 10.3 10.3 5 0 0
2021 21.5 21.5 11 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 3 0 0
2018 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2017 12.6 12.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · GA · Atlanta

1,126 Boxes, waste, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reserve Iron Ohio 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tear A Part, LLC (Salt Lake City) 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PADNOS Wyoming Metals 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joe Krentzman & Son Lewistown 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oakley Ind Operating - 7365 Oakley Industrial Blvd. Union City 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Operating 205 Dairy Pac Rd Athens 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE OREMC Nahunta 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR J&J Quality Door, Inc 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Smooth-Bor Plastics 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Alger Correctional Facility 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Setzer Forest Products - Sacramento 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE HM Clause - Nampa 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avid Pallet Services HQ - Main 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE FB Harding 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE RC Fine Foods 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.