Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) · Pennsylvania

Irwin & Leighton

King of Prussia, PA · ~50 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Irwin & Leighton runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade A.

Irwin & Leighton: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Irwin & Leighton safety composite

Irwin & Leighton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Irwin & Leighton: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Irwin & Leighton's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · King of Prussia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/33
  • PHOTO Bay Ltd.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bay Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Irwin & Leighton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Irwin & Leighton averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Irwin & Leighton TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Irwin & Leighton falls in its industry

924 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 33 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Pennsylvania.

Irwin & Leighton (50 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Irwin & Leighton
Irwin & Leighton (50 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Irwin & Leighton has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, gen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · PA · King of Prussia

924 Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 183 employers in King of Prussia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bay Ltd. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Plus Services 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Arthur Liquefaction Project 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR H+M Industrial EPC 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE To-Jo Food Products Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kulp Family Dairy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maronda Homes Inc of Pennsylvania 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Remodeling Pros of Central PA 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR 199897 9,243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) 2,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring, King of Prussia 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPH2 1,109 FTE
NAT-TCR Supported Independence Srvc of or - 1055 Darlene 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Augusta Corporate Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Minnesota State Univ Moorhead 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert Half - CA San Ramon Corp 90000 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Solution Builders, LLC. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Casting Technologies, Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winchester Utility System 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accent Stripe, Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.