Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing · Mississippi

Hol-Mac Corporation P1

Bay Springs, MS · ~193 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hol-Mac Corporation P1 runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Hol-Mac Corporation P1: 5.5 TCR = 165% of Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hol-Mac Corporation P1 safety composite

Hol-Mac Corporation P1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2020→2021

Hol-Mac Corporation P1 injury rate improved

Hol-Mac Corporation P1's TCR fell 1.0 from 6.0 in 2020 to 4.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.0 · 2021=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Bay Springs, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 165% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO Modern Welding Compa…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Modern Welding Company of Iowa, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Hol-Mac Corporation P1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hol-Mac Corporation P1 averages 5.5 TCR (165% of the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hol-Mac Corporation P1 TCR series: 2020=6 · 2021=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Hol-Mac Corporation P1 falls in its industry

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut employers in Mississippi.

Hol-Mac Corporation P1 (193 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hol-Mac Corporation P1
Hol-Mac Corporation P1 (193 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Hol-Mac Corporation P1 has more employees than the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.9 2.7 11 0 0
2020 6.0 2.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · MS · Bay Springs

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 23 employers in Bay Springs, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Modern Welding Company of Iowa, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TDR Systems, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ottenweller Company, Inc. MA 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Build Solutions, LLC (Port) 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plant Ratcliffe 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tecumseh tupelo 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bollinger Mississippi Repair, LLC 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4740 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peco Foods Inc. (Bay Springs Plant) 746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Springs Processing Facility 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 223 FTE
NAT-TCR Company Headquarters 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Maysville Nursing & Rehabilitation Facility 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel St. Marie 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nasco Electric Sign Company 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pharm Boston 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-CNSA 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE UNC - West Seneca 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE CR-CR-CHARLOTTE 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.