Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis · Mississippi

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3

Bay Springs, MS · ~223 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade D.

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3: 6.5 TCR = 198% of Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 safety composite

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2023→2024

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 injury rate improved

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3's TCR fell 1.8 from 7.5 in 2023 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=7.5 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Bay Springs, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 198% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO IAC Port Huron
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IAC Port Huron (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 averages 6.5 TCR (198% of the Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 TCR series: 2023=7.5 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 falls in its industry

470 Special purpose highway vehicl establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Special purpose highway vehicl employers in Mississippi.

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 (223 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3
Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 (223 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 has more employees than the Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 2.6 10 3 0
2023 7.5 3.5 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · MS · Bay Springs

470 Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 23 employers in Bay Springs, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IAC Port Huron 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watertown Plant 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2357_4303 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Truck & Trailer Specialties, Inc. - Dutton Location 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Pre-Stress Partners 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Syntron Material Handling 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunter Engineering Company Durant Manufacturing Plant 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Madison 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peco Foods Inc. (Bay Springs Plant) 746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Springs Processing Facility 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMC P-2 213 FTE
NAT-TCR Laurence-Hovenier, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Andry Rasmussen & Sons 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Department of General Services 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR University Park Terminal 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Custom Drywall Inc 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ellisville MO 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE AnMed Health Cannon 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Motor Coach Industries 223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.