Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Holtan House Adult Family Homes

Onalaska, WI · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Holtan House Adult Family Homes runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Holtan House Adult Family Homes: 6.4 TCR = 167% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Holtan House Adult Family Homes safety composite

Holtan House Adult Family Homes scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2018→2020

Holtan House Adult Family Homes injury rate improved

Holtan House Adult Family Homes's TCR fell 5.1 from 7.3 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.3 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Onalaska, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 167% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #142/273
  • PHOTO Abbington of Powell
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Abbington of Powell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Holtan House Adult Family Homes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Holtan House Adult Family Homes averages 6.4 TCR (167% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Holtan House Adult Family Homes TCR series: 2018=7.3 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=2.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Holtan House Adult Family Homes falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #142 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Holtan House Adult Family Homes (21 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Holtan House Adult Family Homes
Holtan House Adult Family Homes (21 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Holtan House Adult Family Homes has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2019 9.7 4.8 2 0 0
2018 7.3 7.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Onalaska

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 71 employers in Onalaska, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Abbington of Powell 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HallKeen Assisted Living 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Manor 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Asheville Walden Ridge 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Legacy Farms LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westby 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inguran LLC (dba STgenetics-Vienna Farms) 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALL ENERGY SOLAR MADISON WI 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen - Onalaska Clinic, Renal, and SSB 1,144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Onalaska Support Services 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1679 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Onalaska Clinic 456 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Tex Trailer Manufacturing, LLC. - Wills Point 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Health 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Flowers Baking Company of Thomasville LLC 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR WestRock-Waco Shop 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaPorte Store 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 40130 - Capstone Staples Terre Haute 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE LongMeadow 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roses 558 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.