Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

HallKeen Assisted Living

Norwood, MA · ~717 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HallKeen Assisted Living runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

HallKeen Assisted Living: 6.4 TCR = 167% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HallKeen Assisted Living safety composite

HallKeen Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.2

2018→2024

HallKeen Assisted Living injury rate improved

HallKeen Assisted Living's TCR fell 13.2 from 13.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.2 · 2019=9.3 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Norwood, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 167% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #86/210
  • PHOTO Abbington of Powell
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 154 inj
  • SIZE ~717 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Abbington of Powell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

HallKeen Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HallKeen Assisted Living averages 6.4 TCR (167% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HallKeen Assisted Living TCR series: 2018=13.2 · 2019=9.3 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where HallKeen Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

HallKeen Assisted Living (717 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate HallKeen Assisted Living
HallKeen Assisted Living (717 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

HallKeen Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.5 6.5 33 9 0
2021 9.2 4.8 35 9 0
2019 9.3 2.7 40 5 0
2018 13.2 2.5 46 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Norwood

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 79 employers in Norwood, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Abbington of Powell 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Manor 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Asheville Walden Ridge 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solstice Senior Living at El Cajon 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Mass Ave 719 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyannis Air Service dba Cape Air / Nantucket Air Service 714 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFS-1 721 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon Robotics BOS12 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR MANOR - NORWOOD 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORWOOD (MANOR) 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Market Foods 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office, Norwood, MA 412 FTE
NAT-TCR Max Home, LLC 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ensley 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR OKAY Headquarters 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bergerson-Caswell, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keeneland Association, Inc. 717 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maryland Campus 717 FTE
NAT-SIZE 050 Lci 717 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mann Packing Inc 717 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.