Home care of elderly, non-medical · North Carolina

Home Care of North Carolina

Durham, NC · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Home Care of North Carolina runs at 326% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Home care of elderly, non-medical workplace, earning a grade F.

Home Care of North Carolina: 12.4 TCR = 326% of Home care of elderly, non-medical BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Home Care of North Carolina safety composite

Home Care of North Carolina scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Home Care of North Carolina: 0.0 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 27.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.17× in 2024

Home Care of North Carolina's TCR rose 6.3 from 0.0 in 2019 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 27.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Durham, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 326% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #28/30
  • PHOTO Venice campus
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Venice campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Home Care of North Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Home Care of North Carolina averages 12.4 TCR (326% of the Home care of elderly, non-medical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Home Care of North Carolina TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=26.5 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=27.3 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Home Care of North Carolina falls in its industry

1,320 Home care of elderly, non-medi establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 30 Home care of elderly, non-medi employers in North Carolina.

Home Care of North Carolina (35 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Home Care of North Carolina
Home Care of North Carolina (35 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Home Care of North Carolina has fewer employees than the Home care of elderly, non-medical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 2.1 3 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2022 27.3 18.2 12 0 0
2021 10.8 6.5 5 0 0
2020 26.5 19.3 8 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 17 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NC · Durham

1,320 Home care of elderly, non-medical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Venice campus 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services - 499 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DDS North Region 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrisburg - 6th Street 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boykin Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEW COLONY SOW FARM 6276 -EST 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Field Services 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball LLC Hatchery # 2 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR Advantage Seamless, Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Shafter Division 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Division 20 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Vesta, Inc - Forestville 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Conroe 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bio-Rad Laboratories - Redmond 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Burbank - Public Works - Refuse Collection & Disposal 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sixt Rent A Car - Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport 9 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.