Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson

Catskill, NY · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson: 9.5 TCR = 251% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson safety composite

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2020→2023

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson injury rate improved

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson's TCR fell 6.8 from 10.0 in 2020 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.0 · 2021=24.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Catskill, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 251% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #205/283
  • PHOTO Oakmont of Carmichael
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Carmichael (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Home Sweet Home on the Hudson averages 9.5 TCR (251% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson TCR series: 2020=10 · 2021=24.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Home Sweet Home on the Hudson falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #205 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson (33 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Home Sweet Home on the Hudson
Home Sweet Home on the Hudson (33 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Home Sweet Home on the Hudson has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 24.9 6.2 4 0 0
2020 10.0 5.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Catskill

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 29 employers in Catskill, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Carmichael 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Bloomington Towanda 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Gardens Senior Living 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63122 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Donald DeMarree Fruit Farm, inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillcrest Holsteins, LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Royal-J-Acres, LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCollum Farms, Inc 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia Memorial Family Care 1,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson Heights Family Care Center 1,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Medical 1,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mountain View Medical Practice 1,233 FTE
NAT-TCR Food 4 Less - Rancho Cordova 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 0654 - South San Francisco Ca Bus Ctr 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MCR Langhorne Tenant LLC 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SSA Pacific - Cruise (Breakbulk) 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Sprinkler Systems 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saversystems 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCRT2 Norfolk 2 Tenant LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Battle Ground Store 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.