Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Park Gardens Senior Living

Fergus Falls, MN · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Gardens Senior Living runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Park Gardens Senior Living: 9.5 TCR = 251% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Gardens Senior Living safety composite

Park Gardens Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Park Gardens Senior Living held a steady TCR band

Park Gardens Senior Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 29.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=29.9 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fergus Falls, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 251% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #168/240
  • PHOTO Oakmont of Carmichael
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Carmichael (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Park Gardens Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Gardens Senior Living averages 9.5 TCR (251% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Gardens Senior Living TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=29.9 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Park Gardens Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Park Gardens Senior Living (48 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Gardens Senior Living
Park Gardens Senior Living (48 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Park Gardens Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.2 8.2 0 2 0
2020 29.9 7.5 7 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Fergus Falls

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 77 employers in Fergus Falls, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Carmichael 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Bloomington Towanda 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Sweet Home on the Hudson 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63122 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waukon 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Swenoda 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Region Cooperative - SE Agronomy East/BCA/Shop 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2101-Redwood Falls, MN 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Region Healthcare Corporation 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR LB Homes 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1696 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1696 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Sumner County Hospital District #1 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-02701 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01523 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR JST Logistics, LLC 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE ACCO Brands - Ontario 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG591 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kidzlodge Early Learning Center 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clover Imaging Group LLC - Calexico, CA 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.