Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing · Texas

Honeywell Houston Technology Center

Houston, TX · ~134 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell Houston Technology Center runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honeywell Houston Technology Center: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell Houston Technology Center safety composite

Honeywell Houston Technology Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Honeywell Houston Technology Center held a steady TCR band

Honeywell Houston Technology Center's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.7 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #13/32
  • PHOTO Enovation Controls
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Enovation Controls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell Houston Technology Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell Houston Technology Center averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell Houston Technology Center TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell Houston Technology Center falls in its industry

322 Fluidic devices, circuits, and establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 32 Fluidic devices, circuits, and employers in Texas.

Honeywell Houston Technology Center (134 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell Houston Technology Center
Honeywell Houston Technology Center (134 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Honeywell Houston Technology Center has more employees than the Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · TX · Houston

322 Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Enovation Controls 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valmet 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson Automation Solutions - Chanhassen 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quest Division of TSI 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2362/1956-Lubbock, TX-Mfg (Monsanto Co.) 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Giddings Campus 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE 111479-CHENIERE CC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tripoint Construction Services Incorporated 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Barlovento, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics - Bldg 2212 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Generation Fossil Greene County Steam Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunrise Ag Cooperative Buckman 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porex Porous Technologies Richmond 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE 40 Pine St 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bert Hazekamp & Son 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.