Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) · Indiana

Horner Electric, Inc.

Indianapolis, IN · ~323 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Horner Electric, Inc. runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) workplace, earning a grade C.

Horner Electric, Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 106% of Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Horner Electric, Inc. safety composite

Horner Electric, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Horner Electric, Inc.: 1.2 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2024

Horner Electric, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.6 from 1.2 in 2018 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #39/90
  • PHOTO Alta Enterprises LLC…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~323 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alta Enterprises LLC- Detroit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Horner Electric, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Horner Electric, Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (106% of the Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Horner Electric, Inc. TCR series: 2018=1.2 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 2.1

Where Horner Electric, Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Armature rewinding services (e establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 90 Armature rewinding services (e employers in Indiana.

Horner Electric, Inc. (323 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Horner Electric, Inc.
Horner Electric, Inc. (323 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Horner Electric, Inc. has more employees than the Armature rewinding services (except on a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.2 6 0 0
2023 3.4 1.2 11 0 0
2022 1.2 0.3 4 0 0
2021 3.0 0.3 10 0 0
2020 1.5 0.3 5 0 0
2019 3.4 0.0 12 0 0
2018 1.2 0.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IN · Indianapolis

2,560 Armature rewinding services (except on an assembly line or factory basis) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alta Enterprises LLC- Detroit 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMC Gulfport 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heavyquip Houston 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Upper Midwest : SVC-Twin Cities MN-USA 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE IPL Petersburg 323 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCI - 227 323 FTE
STATE-SIZE MPT (Magna Powertrain) Muncie - Cowan 323 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1329 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Cambria McAllen Convention Center 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cookeville 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fraser Construction Company 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JAH Power Services 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bernicks Pepsi & Chas A Bernick of St Cloud 323 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overhead Door Company of Atlanta 323 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Morey Corporation 323 FTE
NAT-SIZE CalDoor and Drawer 323 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.