Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing · Ohio

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant

Cleveland, OH · ~116 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant: 3.6 TCR = 110% of Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant safety composite

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant: 1.1 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2023

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant's TCR rose 3.7 from 1.1 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333612 · Cleveland, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 110% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO GearTec Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GearTec Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant averages 3.6 TCR (110% of the Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=2 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant falls in its industry

106 Drives, high-speed industrial establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Drives, high-speed industrial employers in Ohio.

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant (116 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant
Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant (116 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Horsburgh & Scott Co. - Main Plant has more employees than the Drives, high-speed industrial (except hy median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.8 2.8 7 0 0
2022 4.2 3.5 6 0 0
2021 5.8 3.6 6 2 0
2020 3.7 2.8 4 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 5 0 0
2018 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333612 · OH · Cleveland

106 Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GearTec Inc 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SEW Eurodrive Lyman Assembly 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bison Gear and Engineering 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brad Foote Gearing Cicero 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AKRON - EASTWOOD SHOP 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shook Construction Co. - Brecksville 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strawser Construction Inc. Construction Shop 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Xtreme Elements LLC 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Habitat for Humanity of Omaha 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Speedco 944 Ripon, CA 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SC006 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PMG Pilgrim Manor 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rafael Framers 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loffredo Fresh Foods 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Families in Transition 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Corporate Office 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.