Aluminum sheet made by flat rolling purchased aluminum · Arkansas

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant

Malvern, AR · ~208 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aluminum sheet made by flat rolling purchased aluminum workplace, earning a grade B.

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Aluminum sheet made by flat rolling purchased aluminum BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant safety composite

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant: 1.4 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.4 in 2021 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331315 · Malvern, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Reynolds Consumer Pr…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~208 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Aluminum sheet made by flat rolling purchased aluminum BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant TCR series: 2021=1.4 · 2022=2.3 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant falls in its industry

70 Aluminum sheet made by flat ro establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Aluminum sheet made by flat ro employers in Arkansas.

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant (208 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 208 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant
Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant (208 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 208 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant has more employees than the Aluminum sheet made by flat rolling purc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.4 4 0 0
2022 2.3 1.4 4 1 0
2021 1.4 0.9 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331315 · AR · Malvern

70 Aluminum sheet made by flat rolling purchased aluminum employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 33 employers in Malvern, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCP Hot Spring 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alcoa - Warrick Operations 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gateway Aluminum 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riceland Foods, Inc. - Soy Division 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Plastics Little Rock 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE Intimidator Group BBB 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 8104 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 127 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR 127 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Food Merchandising : MALVERN 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anthony Timberlands - Malvern 186 FTE
NAT-TCR Charter Next Generation - Milton 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 029 - S Center Rd Burton 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 067 - Monroe 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 117 - W Central Ave Sylvania 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Francis Coppola Winery 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE 183 - Elgin IL 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE 288 - Owensboro KY 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Emerson Automation Solutions - Eden Prairie 208 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.