Foil, aluminum, made by flat rolling purchased aluminum · Illinois

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant

Wheeling, IL · ~363 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Foil, aluminum, made by flat rolling purchased aluminum workplace, earning a grade B.

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Foil, aluminum, made by flat rolling purchased aluminum BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant safety composite

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant held a steady TCR band

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.9 in 2020 to 2.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.9 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331315 · Wheeling, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO RCP Hot Spring
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~363 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RCP Hot Spring (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Foil, aluminum, made by flat rolling purchased aluminum BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant TCR series: 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant falls in its industry

70 Foil, aluminum, made by flat r establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Foil, aluminum, made by flat r employers in Illinois.

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant (363 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 208 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant
Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant (363 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 208 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Reynolds Consumer Products Wheeling Plant has more employees than the Foil, aluminum, made by flat rolling pur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.1 1.4 8 1 0
2021 1.7 1.5 6 1 0
2020 1.9 0.9 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331315 · IL · Wheeling

70 Foil, aluminum, made by flat rolling purchased aluminum employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 136 employers in Wheeling, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RCP Hot Spring 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hot Spring Continuous Rolling Plant 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alcoa - Warrick Operations 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aleris 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mitsubishi Electric Automation, Inc. 363 FTE
STATE-SIZE Principal Manufacturing 363 FTE
STATE-SIZE Get Fresh Produce - Bartlett 363 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1454 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR IL-01 4,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wheeling School District 21 967 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Office - 01 800 FTE
CITY-NEAR Response Team 1 728 FTE
NAT-TCR Signature Flight Support-MKE250 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4261 Corona CA Container 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4503 Florence Mill 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0765 - Folsom Ca Whse 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0748 - Cypress Ca Whse 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0783 - Eden Prairie Mn Whse 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE 253921-Grand Rapids Mi P&Dc 363 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.