Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in industrial research (except nanobiotechnology research and development) · Ohio

Hq & Field

Mason, OH · ~915 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hq & Field runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in industrial research (except nanobiotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade D.

Hq & Field: 0.7 TCR = 138% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in industrial research (except nanobiotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hq & Field safety composite

Hq & Field scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2022→2024

Hq & Field injury rate improved

Hq & Field's TCR fell 0.9 from 1.2 in 2022 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.2 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541714 · Mason, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.7 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK P67
  • PHOTO Minnetonka, MN
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~915 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minnetonka, MN (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Hq & Field in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hq & Field averages 0.7 TCR (138% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in industrial research (except nanobiotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hq & Field TCR series: 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Hq & Field falls in its industry

21 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Hq & Field (915 employees, TCR 0.7) among 7 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 915 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 8 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 00.511.52 Average employees Total Case Rate Genentech SSFJanssen RandD Spring HouseMinnetonka, MNEncodia, Inc.Milliken & Company- RMC (Corporate Headquarters)Janssen Pharmaceutical RandD San DiegoPleasanton, CAHq & Field
Hq & Field (915 employees, TCR 0.7) among 7 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 915 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Hq & Field has more employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.2 4 0 0
2023 0.5 0.5 5 0 0
2022 1.2 0.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541714 · OH · Mason

21 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in industrial research (except nanobiotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 159 employers in Mason, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minnetonka, MN 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LanzaTech 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DM Clinical Research Corporate 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ironwood-HQ 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sycamore Medical Center 915 FTE
STATE-SIZE Continental Structural Plastics - Carey 912 FTE
STATE-SIZE Victoria's Secret Direct Call Center 910 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CMH2 920 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems, LLC, dba Honeywell Intelligrated and its successors 1,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intelligrated Systems LLC - Installations 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics 892 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Cincinnati Electronics 811 FTE
NAT-TCR Xtra Factors 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Polaris Industries 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Metal co. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR C.W. Brower, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Houston Facility 915 FTE
NAT-SIZE Three Rivers Park District 915 FTE
NAT-SIZE 482269-Dallas Ndc 915 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MSP9 915 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.