Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard · New York
Huhtamaki Fulton
Fulton, NY · ~416 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.3
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Huhtamaki Fulton runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.3
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 14
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Huhtamaki Fulton's OSHA Total Case Rate of 2.3 to the Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark of 3.3 (69% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Huhtamaki Fulton's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Huhtamaki Fulton falls in its industry
148 Food containers, sanitary (exc establishmentsSafer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.
Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Food containers, sanitary (exc employers in New York.
Trend analysis for Huhtamaki Fulton
Between 2023 and 2024, Huhtamaki Fulton's Total Case Rate worsened from 2.2 to 2.4 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 7% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2023, at a TCR of 2.2, while 2024 saw the highest rate, at 2.4, a spread of 0.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Huhtamaki Fulton recorded 14 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 14 injuries, 5 illnesses shown on this page for Huhtamaki Fulton are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 322219 - Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
5 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 852,000 hours worked = 1.17 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Huhtamaki Fulton (this establishment) | 2.28 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Fiber tubes made from purchased paperboard industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 322219 |
| New York state avg (all industries) | 4.67 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Huhtamaki Fulton to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 10 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 4 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 9 reportable incidents · 8 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 6 | 4 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Huhtamaki Fulton's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 69% of the Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard benchmark, Huhtamaki Fulton reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Huhtamaki Fulton's safety grade?
How many injuries has Huhtamaki Fulton reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within New York, and by nearby establishments in Fulton - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~2.3)
Similar size (~416 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.