Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard · New York

Huhtamaki Fulton

Fulton, NY · ~416 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Huhtamaki Fulton runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Huhtamaki Fulton: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Huhtamaki Fulton safety composite

Huhtamaki Fulton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Huhtamaki Fulton held a steady TCR band

Huhtamaki Fulton's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.2 in 2023 to 2.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.2 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Fulton, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK P71
  • PHOTO GREIF (IP SALT LAKE …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~416 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GREIF (IP SALT LAKE CITY) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Huhtamaki Fulton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Huhtamaki Fulton averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Huhtamaki Fulton TCR series: 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Huhtamaki Fulton falls in its industry

140 Food containers, sanitary (exc establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Huhtamaki Fulton (416 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Huhtamaki Fulton
Huhtamaki Fulton (416 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Huhtamaki Fulton has more employees than the Food containers, sanitary (except foldin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.2 6 4 0
2023 2.2 1.7 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · NY · Fulton

140 Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 31 employers in Fulton, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GREIF (IP SALT LAKE CITY) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlotte (Fiber) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easton 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austell Tube and Core 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lippolis Electric, Inc. 416 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10220 Brooklyn 416 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2210 416 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1835 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huhtamaki- Fulton 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huhtamaki, Inc. 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3332 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3332 323 FTE
NAT-TCR Nations Roof of Ohio 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mongiovi and Son 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams Thermal Systems 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lena Warehouse/Distribution 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE XALT Energy, LLC 416 FTE
NAT-SIZE TS Trim Industries Inc. 416 FTE
NAT-SIZE NJ16BBU 416 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tnver - La Vergne Hub 416 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.