Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) · Oregon

Hunter Communications, Inc.

Central Point, OR · ~78 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hunter Communications, Inc. runs at 387% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Hunter Communications, Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 387% of Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hunter Communications, Inc. safety composite

Hunter Communications, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hunter Communications, Inc.: 0.4 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2019

Hunter Communications, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.1 from 0.4 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Central Point, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 387% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Pequot Lakes - 30965…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pequot Lakes - 30965 2nd St (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Hunter Communications, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hunter Communications, Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (387% of the Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hunter Communications, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0.4 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=2.5 · BLS 0.7

Where Hunter Communications, Inc. falls in its industry

537 Internet service providers, us establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Internet service providers, us employers in Oregon.

Hunter Communications, Inc. (78 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hunter Communications, Inc.
Hunter Communications, Inc. (78 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Hunter Communications, Inc. has fewer employees than the Internet service providers, using own op median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.5 1.3 2 0 0
2018 5.2 0.0 4 0 0
2017 0.4 0.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · OR · Central Point

537 Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 63 employers in Central Point, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pequot Lakes - 30965 2nd St 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midlands 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ace Telephone Association Houston 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCN Telecom Services, LLC - Starpower Lanham MD 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oregon Harvesting Inc 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE LTM, Incorporated dba Knife River Materials Coos Bay 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tidewater Contractors, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1287 - CENTRAL POINT OR WHSE 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willow Springs Complex 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Combined Transport 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardmoore 180 FTE
NAT-TCR Walnut Hills Elementary 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Norlake 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedford 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR EFP Decatur 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Studio TK 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1831 W. Jefferson 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Villas at Canterfield 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Desert Behavioral Health Center 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.