Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Oregon

Willow Springs Complex

Name: Willow Springs Complex Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Central Point, OR · ~193 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.7
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Willow Springs Complex runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Willow Springs Complex: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Willow Springs Complex safety composite

Willow Springs Complex scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers
DART rate: F 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Willow Springs Complex held a steady TCR band

Willow Springs Complex's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.9 in 2022 to 2.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.9 · 2023=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Central Point, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

DART 2.0 DART
RANK #1/5
PHOTO Enjet Aero - TH
BOOK 2y book
INJ 10 inj
SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Enjet Aero - TH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.7
Enjet Aero - T

2.7
Precision Gear

2.7
MB Aerospace

2.7
Rolls-Royce: B

2.7

What this shows Willow Springs Complex averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Willow Springs Complex TCR series: 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Willow Springs Complex falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Oregon.

Willow Springs Complex (193 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Willow Springs Complex has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	2.5	2.0	5	0	0
2022	2.9	2.9	5	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · OR · Central Point

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 63 employers in Central Point, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Enjet Aero - TH	TERRE HAUTE, IN	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Precision Gear	COLLEGE POINT, NY	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MB Aerospace	EAST GRANBY, CT	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Rolls-Royce: Banded Stator	INDIANAPOLIS, IN	2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Oregon DC 0911	PORTLAND	193 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Hamilton Construction Company	SPRINGFIELD	192 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sanders Wood Products	MOLALLA	194 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Biamp Cascade	TIGARD	192 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1287 - CENTRAL POINT OR WHSE	Central Point	337 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Combined Transport	Central Point	182 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cardmoore	Central Point	180 FTE
CITY-NEAR	TP Trucking	Central Point	169 FTE
NAT-TCR	Guardian Industries, LLC	Kingsburg, CA	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ptsc - La & Lb	Long Beach, CA	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Corydon Recovery LLC	Corydon, IN	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mitchell Convalescent Center	Camilla, GA	2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Vivo Beach Club	San Juan, PR	193 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Atlanta Packaging Center	Atlanta, GA	193 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hytek Finishes	Kent, WA	193 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mission Point Resort	Mackinac Island, MI	193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.