Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · North Carolina

Hunter Construction Group Inc

Mooresville, NC · ~117 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hunter Construction Group Inc runs at 360% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Hunter Construction Group Inc: 10.1 TCR = 360% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hunter Construction Group Inc safety composite

Hunter Construction Group Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2018→2022

Hunter Construction Group Inc injury rate improved

Hunter Construction Group Inc's TCR fell 1.3 from 12.2 in 2018 to 10.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.2 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=10.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Mooresville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 360% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/55
  • PHOTO Stettler Supply Comp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stettler Supply Company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hunter Construction Group Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hunter Construction Group Inc averages 10.1 TCR (360% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hunter Construction Group Inc TCR series: 2018=12.2 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=10.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Hunter Construction Group Inc falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 55 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in North Carolina.

Hunter Construction Group Inc (117 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hunter Construction Group Inc
Hunter Construction Group Inc (117 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Hunter Construction Group Inc has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.9 0.0 7 0 0
2021 7.8 1.1 7 0 0
2020 9.5 0.7 13 1 1
2018 12.2 3.9 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · NC · Mooresville

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 161 employers in Mooresville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stettler Supply Company 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortman Drilling, Inc. Main 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.U.R. Construction West, Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kempton Construction LLC 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Carolina 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haskells Hardware LLC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bernhard MCC L.L.C. MNC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quan Services, Inc. 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mooresville Graded School District 886 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGK Ceramics USA, Inc. 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR BestCo LLC 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR POWERHOME SOLAR 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Jackson County Intermediate School District 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanwa International Wholesale Foods, LLC 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0017-0016-00197 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-03241 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Starke Hospital 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acrylic Design Associates 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #022 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.