Homes for the aged without nursing care · New York

Vassar-Warner Home

Poughkeepsie, NY · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vassar-Warner Home runs at 343% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the aged without nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Vassar-Warner Home: 13.0 TCR = 343% of Homes for the aged without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vassar-Warner Home safety composite

Vassar-Warner Home scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2018→2023

Vassar-Warner Home injury rate improved

Vassar-Warner Home's TCR fell 4.1 from 10.6 in 2018 to 6.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 31.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.6 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=31.2 · 2023=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Poughkeepsie, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 343% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #244/283
  • PHOTO Carson Valley Senior…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carson Valley Senior Living & Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Vassar-Warner Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vassar-Warner Home averages 13.0 TCR (343% of the Homes for the aged without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vassar-Warner Home TCR series: 2018=10.6 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=31.2 · 2023=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Vassar-Warner Home falls in its industry

6,510 Homes for the aged without nur establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #244 safest of 283 Homes for the aged without nur employers in New York.

Vassar-Warner Home (34 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Vassar-Warner Home
Vassar-Warner Home (34 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Vassar-Warner Home has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged without nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.5 3.2 2 0 0
2022 31.2 6.2 10 0 0
2021 9.3 3.1 3 0 0
2020 15.5 0.0 5 0 0
2019 5.1 2.5 2 0 0
2018 10.6 2.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Poughkeepsie

6,510 Homes for the aged without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 133 employers in Poughkeepsie, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carson Valley Senior Living & Memory Care 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Orangeburg 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCP Boca Raton FL OpCo, LLC 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerby at St. Vincent's One Nineteen 13.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reeves Farms LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenview Dairy LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Farm LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porterdale Farms Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vassar Brothers Medical Center 2,574 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dutchess County Government 1,750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mid-Hudson Valley Staffco 1,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adams Fairacre Farms, Inc. 1,390 FTE
NAT-TCR Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gresham #047 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HW Johnson Concrete Construction 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR El Dorado Truss Co, Inc 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Rdu 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cornerstone Auto Resource of Plymouth, Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE IBC Engineered Materials 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Total Source Packaging 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.