Waste recovery facilities · Pennsylvania

Hydro Hauling

State College, PA · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydro Hauling runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Waste recovery facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Hydro Hauling: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Waste recovery facilities BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydro Hauling safety composite

Hydro Hauling scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hydro Hauling held a steady TCR band

Hydro Hauling's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · State College, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/22
  • PHOTO S09107 - Garland MRF
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S09107 - Garland MRF (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Hydro Hauling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hydro Hauling averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Waste recovery facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hydro Hauling TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Hydro Hauling falls in its industry

422 Waste recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 22 Waste recovery facilities employers in Pennsylvania.

Hydro Hauling (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hydro Hauling
Hydro Hauling (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Hydro Hauling has fewer employees than the Waste recovery facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · PA · State College

422 Waste recovery facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 148 employers in State College, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S09107 - Garland MRF 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY191 Harmon New York Administrative Office 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S08605 - SMaRT 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05731 - Salt Lake MRF 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. Parnell Fisheries Co. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Run Energy, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPV Fairview LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Corporate Office 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Nittany Medical Center 1,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans State College 098 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2230 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2230 344 FTE
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HI-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NY-03 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond East 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Venable Avenue PRTF 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cervesia Gratis Inc. Lovell Taproom/Brewery 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Webb Concrete & Building Materials, Inc. Birmingham 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Blytheville, AR Remote Shop 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.