Forming machines (except drawing), metalworking, manufacturing · Indiana

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division

Franklin, IN · ~43 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division runs at 382% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Forming machines (except drawing), metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division: 12.6 TCR = 382% of Forming machines (except drawing), metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division safety composite

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2017→2021

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division injury rate improved

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division's TCR fell 6.6 from 14.4 in 2017 to 7.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.4 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=16.0 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Franklin, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 382% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO Main
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division averages 12.6 TCR (382% of the Forming machines (except drawing), metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division TCR series: 2017=14.4 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=16 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=7.8 · BLS 3.3

Where IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division falls in its industry

391 Forming machines (except drawi establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Forming machines (except drawi employers in Indiana.

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division (43 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division
IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division (43 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

IBC Advanced Alloys, Franklin Division has fewer employees than the Forming machines (except drawing), metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.8 3.9 2 0 0
2020 9.3 0.0 3 0 0
2019 16.0 0.0 5 0 0
2018 15.5 0.0 5 0 0
2017 14.4 2.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · IN · Franklin

391 Forming machines (except drawing), metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 78 employers in Franklin, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Micro-Matics 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPS Plant 5 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elemet Manufacturing, Inc 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Fork Farms 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics IN Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kosciusko REMC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Memorial Health 878 FTE
CITY-NEAR KAC Franklin 726 FTE
CITY-NEAR Government 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reman Powertrain Indiana 473 FTE
NAT-TCR General Parts - Kansas City 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cheshire Police 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02820 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HG052 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colorado Operations (Durango, CO) 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCI Columbia, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE SpecSys Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE SMG -Tucson Convention Center 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.