Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · New Jersey

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2

Lumberton, NJ · ~179 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 safety composite

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2: 0.8 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.39× in 2021

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.8 in 2020 to 1.7 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Lumberton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO SigmaPro Eng. & Mfg.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~179 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SigmaPro Eng. & Mfg. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 TCR series: 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in New Jersey.

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 (179 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate ICC - Divisions M1 and M2
ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 (179 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

ICC - Divisions M1 and M2 has more employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.7 1.7 3 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · NJ · Lumberton

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 30 employers in Lumberton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SigmaPro Eng. & Mfg. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Reynolds 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITT Cannon 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Samtec Microelectronics 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE US137: North Jersey 518 - SG 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCCB 1L06 MOORESTOWN NJ PRODUCTION 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Pharma Labs Inc. 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camfil -Riverdale, NJ 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR 86080B01 CVS PHARMACY, INC. 963 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6795-86080B0199 902 FTE
CITY-NEAR Interstate Connecting Components/Trek Connect - A Division of Heilind Mil-Aero 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2841 252 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Greensboro Planning Department 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Longview Area 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4016144 - Swa Lax T1.5 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR B&H - Toy Store Warehouse 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nexion Health 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Freight Lines, Inc. - Waco Corporate 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centrtal Freight Lines, Inc. - Houston 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGI-Menard Inc. 179 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.