Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) · Pennsylvania

iFLY KOP

King of Prussia, PA · ~28 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

iFLY KOP runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) workplace, earning a grade F.

iFLY KOP: 10.9 TCR = 353% of Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) BLS 3.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

iFLY KOP safety composite

iFLY KOP scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 27.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

iFLY KOP: 0.0 → 27.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 27.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.55× in 2019

iFLY KOP's TCR rose 27.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 27.8 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713990 · King of Prussia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 353% of ind

  • DART 27.8 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO iFLY Sacramento
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: iFLY Sacramento (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

iFLY KOP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows iFLY KOP averages 10.9 TCR (353% of the Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

iFLY KOP TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=5 · 2019=27.8 · BLS 3.1

Where iFLY KOP falls in its industry

289 Amusement device (except gambl establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Amusement device (except gambl employers in Pennsylvania.

iFLY KOP (28 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate iFLY KOP
iFLY KOP (28 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 5.0

iFLY KOP has fewer employees than the Amusement device (except gambling) conce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 27.8 27.8 5 0 0
2018 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713990 · PA · King of Prussia

289 Amusement device (except gambling) concession operators (i.e., supplying and servicing in others' facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 183 employers in King of Prussia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR iFLY Sacramento 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR J&M Displays, Inc. 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kualoa Ranch Hawaii, Inc. 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR iFLY San Antonio 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masda Mushroom LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scenery Hill 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance PA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bethlehem Energy Center 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR 199897 9,243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) 2,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring, King of Prussia 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPH2 1,109 FTE
NAT-TCR Trouw Nutrition Neosho 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Creekwood Complex 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR rio rancho center 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairchild Equipment - Burnsville 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foodliner-Winchester 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE JSC Terminal LLC, dba Midwest Terminal 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brim's Imports 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.